Despite many data privacy enforcement actions being launched against larger tech companies, the Federal Trade Commission recently took action against Drizly and its CEO for a data breach in 2018 (pre-Uber acquisition). Drizly is an online platform for ordering alcohol delivery.
In its complaint, the FTC cited Drizly and its CEO's failure to implement basic security measures – including proper storage and monitoring for threats. Drizly, its CEO, and the FTC agreed to a consent order requiring Drizly to destroy unnecessary data, limit its future collection, and create a data security program.
The important takeaways here are:
- The FTC may start enforcing against startups and other small companies;
- The corporate veil may not always shield CEOs and other officers from the FTC's (or any other regulator's) wrath; and
- The privacy and security work that a company does early, while it may take a few dollars from marketing in the near term, will pay incredible dividends later on by avoiding litigation with the FTC, or being sued by private citizens if there is a data breach – the cost of which is higher than ever before.
/Passle/62189924f636e915f48daeda/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-12-21-37-33-331-698e481dfb33fd3b3493afad.jpg)
/Passle/62189924f636e915f48daeda/SearchServiceImages/2026-02-19-13-08-23-286-69970b47ed31acc93b149cd6.jpg)
/Passle/62189924f636e915f48daeda/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-08-18-01-38-649-695ff102ed1fe6d595d1e719.jpg)
/Passle/62189924f636e915f48daeda/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-30-19-54-26-555-69542df2bd098cc4b3f8d9b7.jpg)