This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Asset 3
  • Home Page
  • About
  • People
  • Experience
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Public Interest
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Asset 1

Contact us

Asset 2

Locations

  • Contact us
    Contact us
  • Locations
    Locations
  • Search
    Search
  • About
    • Message from the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Pro Bono
    • Women in Business Series
    • Law Firm Network
  • People
  • Experience
    • Practices & Industries
    • Geographies
  • Insights
    • Alerts & Bulletins
    • Articles
    • Briefings
    • Events
    • Firm News
    • Podcasts
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
      • What to Expect
    • Staff & Paralegals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Search
  • About
    • Message from the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Pro Bono
    • Women in Business Series
    • Law Firm Network
  • People
  • Experience
    • Practices & Industries
    • Geographies
  • Insights
    • Alerts & Bulletins
    • Articles
    • Briefings
    • Events
    • Firm News
    • Podcasts
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
      • What to Expect
    • Staff & Paralegals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
  • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Search People

Search by last name

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

see all people

Asset 3
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • youtube
  • rss

© 2022 Brown Rudnick LLP. Attorney advertising.

All Rights Reserved.

All Posts
print-logo
February 13, 2023 | 2 minutes read

Jury Returns Verdict in MetaBirkin Case, Finding Infringement

11
Avatar
Daniel Healy
Partner
Avatar
Daniel Healy
Partner
11

After roughly three days of deliberations, the jury in the Hermes International et al v. Rothschild found that the defendant had infringed the plaintiffs’ trademark rights. Hermés has sold its famous Birkin bags for many years. They sell at retail for six-figure amounts. Artist Mason Rothschild created NFTs (non-fungible tokens) called MetaBirkins. The NFTs looked like Hermés Birkin bags and had a range of different designs, colors and other visual effects. In 2021, Rothschild allegedly sold 100 MetaBirkins for cryptocurrency that equated to $450. Many of the MetaBirkins were resold.

Hermés asserted that the MetaBirkins confused customers and looked similar enough Birkin Bags to be infringing. Among other claims, Hermés contended that the MetaBirkins were intended to trade on and profit from the use of the famous Birkin bag mark and name. It argued that Rothschild was purely looking to profit off of Hermés intellectual property and was motivated by profit. It claimed the NFTs themselves, as well as the MetaBirkin name and domain name (metabirkin.com), infringed and diluted the Birkin mark.

Rothschild argued that the NFTs were art and that he had artistic and free speech rights to create NFTs. According to him, the motivation included creating art and commenting on both the use of fur in fashion and the concept of high-priced, luxury handbags. He further argued that whether or not he profited from the sale of his art was not the point. He testified at trial that he was not liable for infringement because his use of certain characteristics of Birkin bags and the term “Birkin” is not prevented by trademark law and was permitted as a fair use. Rothschild likened the MetaBirkin NFTs to Andy Warhol’s art. He specifically compared them with Andy Warhol’s creation of images of Campbell’s Soup cans. These defenses injected hefty legal concepts into the case. The dispute has garnered attention across the media because the result will likely have a ripple affect in the NFT community, and possibly the art world generally.

Rothschild also contended that he could not be found to have infringed because Hermés did not establish that the public was confused by the NFTs. This more practical defense focused on the facts and whether the NFTs would be assumed to be associated with Hermés, or were clearly a criticism or other commentary on luxury items. 

During trial, Hermés introduced texts from Rothschild in which he allegedly wrote, "We're sitting on a gold mine" in 2021 to a designer who worked with him to create the NFTs at issue. Other facts, such as Rothschild’s use of the term “Birkin” in the name of the NFTs and the website for offering them for sale, were all used to support the argument by Hermés that Rothschild's primary purpose was to make a profit and to do so using the “Birkin” name.

Ultimately, the jury determined that the NFTs infringed Hermés trademark rights. The jury awarded Hermés approximately $133,000 in damages, based on profits and cybersquatting. The amount is less than the full award sought by Hermés. 

Already, questions have arisen about a potential appeal. Other creators and sellers of NFTs have concerns about the verdict. As NFTs have proliferated in recent years, the law continues to struggle to keep up. It remains to be seen if the verdict will be upheld, if appealed. Also unclear is whether other courts will look to this case in deciding other disputes over the creation, use and sale of NFTs. 

A nine-person federal jury in Manhattan determined that Rothschild had infringed on the company’s trademark rights and awarded Hermès $133,000 in total damages. The jurors also found that his NFTs were not protected speech.
www.nytimes.com/...
featured image

Tags

hermes, metabirkin, nft, trademark, mason rothschild, crypto
Avatar
Daniel Healy
Partner
Avatar
Daniel Healy
Partner
post featured image
Mar 27, 2023

Former Silicon Valley Bank Acquired by First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company in North Carolina

By Michael Cohen
At breakneck speed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has concluded a sale of Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. (formerly...
3
20
12
35

Latest Insights

post featured image
Mar 14, 2023

EPA Proposes PFAS Drinking Water Regulation

By Kyle Johnson
4
10
14
post featured image
Mar 13, 2023

SVB Collapse – Closing Your Account

By Michael Cohen
2
37
39
post featured image
Mar 13, 2023

Historic Weekend Ends With Relief for SVB Depositors – Now the Work Begins!

By Michael Cohen Ben Hron
10
32
42
post featured image
Mar 12, 2023

Brown Rudnick Webinar: Silicon Valley Bank Failure: What We Know Now and What to Do

By Julia Bennett Thomas Phillips Michael Cohen Amanda Varella Barbara Klepper Stephen Best Stephen Palley Daniel Healy Camille Vasquez Neil Foster Tim Davison +8 more...

Show less

3
42
45