This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Asset 3
  • About
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Public Interest
  • Inclusion
  • Contact us
    Contact us
  • Locations
    Offices
  • Search
    Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Geographies
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Real Estate
    • Technology
    • United States
    • United Kingdom
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution & Transactions
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Oil & Gas Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Real Estate
    • Special Situations
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Oil & Gas Litigation
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Learning
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Geographies
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • United States
    • United Kingdom
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution & Transactions
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Real Estate
    • Special Situations
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Oil & Gas Litigation
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Learning
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series

Search People

Search by last name

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

see all people

Asset 3
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

© 2024 Brown Rudnick LLP. Attorney advertising.

All Rights Reserved.

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
1/20/2023 9:04:05 PM | 1 minute read

Policyholder Permitted to Keep Third-Party Indemnity Recovery and Be Made Whole, Instead of Forfeiting Coverage

1
1

Get in touch

Avatar
Daniel Healy
Income Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Daniel Healy
Income Partner
1
1

The recent ruling in T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance Company signals several good indicators for policyholders. A straight-up win for the policyholder, the case held that the insurance company could not reap the benefits of the policyholder’s successful efforts to recover part of its loss from third parties. That holding alone clarifies that cyber insurance policies are meant to protect policyholders. Further, it indicates that policyholders should be made whole before insurance companies can recoup monies paid as coverage.

In the case, T-Mobile had suffered a $17.3 million loss from a cyber-security breach that was covered under its cyber insurance policy. The policy had a $10 million retention or “SIR” that T-Mobile absorbed before the policy paid the remaining $7.3 million in coverage. By pursuing its vendor for indemnity, T-Mobile recovered $10.75 million. The insurance company then claimed that it did not owe any coverage, arguing that T-Mobile’s “loss” did not exceed the retention. The court disagreed and held that the recovery from a third party could be applied to the retention and did not eliminate T-Mobile’s “loss.”

The case indicates that cyber policies are covering losses and, when an insurance company refuses to provide coverage, the policies can be enforced in court. The facts of the case illustrate the growing complexity of cyber incidents, that increasingly involve numerous parties with different losses. T-Mobile was able to hold a vendor liable by relying on and enforcing contractual indemnity obligations. Policyholders should pay attention to such indemnity provisions in their contracts. These provisions may help make higher deductibles more palatable, because they can be enforced as first-dollar obligations from vendors or other business partners. The contractual insurance requirements that go hand-in-hand with those indemnity provisions–requiring the vendor or business partner to have responsive insurance in place–can be of equal importance. Often the expectation is that such insurance policies will pay for the contractual indemnity obligations.

As the cyber insurance market continues to harden, policyholders can expect insurance companies to dispute coverage. Policyholders also can help spread or transfer their risk by looking to the indemnity provisions in their commercial contracts and, potentially, to the insurance policies backing up those contractual obligations.  The T-Mobile case is an excellent, if hard-fought, example of those protections the policyholder put into place being enforced to provide the expected recoveries.

According to Steadfast, that recovery "absolved" T-Mobile from paying $10.75 million because Experian indemnified T-Mobile .... The policy excludes from its definition of "loss" "any amount for which the Insureds are absolved from payment." The policy does not define the word "absolve." But the dictionary defines "absolve" as "to set free or release from some obligation, debt, or responsibility." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 7 (2002). But the Experian recovery did not "absolve" T-Mobile from payment because it did not set free or release T-Mobile from its obligation to pay the costs and expenses it incurred from the data breach. T-Mobile remained directly liable for those obligations and paid them in full. Experian then reimbursed T-Mobile for some .... We conclude that the policy does not exclude as a covered loss the $10.75 million T-Mobile recovered from Experian.
casetext.com/...
featured image

Sign up to receive our latest BRiefings delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe

Tags

insurance recovery, contractual indemnity, cyber insurance, data breach

Get in touch

Avatar
Daniel Healy
Income Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Daniel Healy
Income Partner
CJEU Expands GDPR Scope and Clarifies Treatment of Pseudonymized Data: What Businesses Need to Know
9/18/2025 3:22:01 PM

CJEU Expands GDPR Scope and Clarifies Treatment of Pseudonymized Data: What Businesses Need to Know

By Matthew Richardson Jase Panebianco
In a landmark ruling issued on September 4, 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided critical clarification on...

Latest Insights

The End of Upward-Only Rent Reviews in UK Commercial Leases?
9/16/2025 9:44:13 AM

The End of Upward-Only Rent Reviews in UK Commercial Leases?

By Kevin Fidler
12
12
What do US technology companies need to know about the UK’s Online Safety Act?
9/15/2025 9:59:52 AM

What do US technology companies need to know about the UK’s Online Safety Act?

By Ian Weinstein Neil Foster Stephen Palley Charlotte Harris Matthew Richardson +2 more...

Show less

34
34
Trust Litigation Meets Tax Disputes
9/3/2025 9:44:00 AM

Trust Litigation Meets Tax Disputes

By Matthew Sharp
26
26