This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Asset 3
  • About
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Public Interest
  • Inclusion
  • Contact us
    Contact us
  • Locations
    Locations
  • Search
    Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution & Transactions
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution & Transactions
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series

Search People

Search by last name

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

see all people

Asset 3
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

© 2024 Brown Rudnick LLP. Attorney advertising.

All Rights Reserved.

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
10/20/2017 12:00:00 AM | 2 minute read

Challenging Negative CPARS at the Court Of Federal Claims: A Cautionary Tale

3

Get in touch

Avatar
Kenneth Weckstein
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Kenneth Weckstein
Partner
3

Cautionary tales have been around for hundreds of years, serving to warn its listeners of a certain danger. They traditionally have three parts: 1) a danger is identified; 2) someone engages in the dangerous act; 3) the results of engaging in the dangerous act are undesirable. This is one of many cautionary tales in the government contracts arena.

First, a dangerous act -- in this tale, challenging negative performance evaluations at the Court of Federal Claims ("COFC").

Second, someone engages in the dangerous act -- in Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, LLC v. United States, No. 17-868C, 2017 WL 4366238 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 2, 2017), the plaintiff alleged (among other things) that the Department of State exaggerated and manufactured negative performance issues during the review of plaintiff's performance of the incumbent contract and entered those evaluations into the CPARS.

Third, the results are undesirable -- negative information about plaintiff's past performance is made public. Here, the plaintiff sought to redact all negative information that derived from CPARS evaluations of the plaintiff's incumbent contract performance. The COFC found that such information should not be redacted and should be made available to the public

The plaintiff argued that CPARS information is "source-selection information that should be protected from disclosure to prevent [plaintiff's] competitors from gaining an unfair advantage in future solicitations." The COFC acknowledged that past performance information entered into the CPARS is source-selection information and should not be released to other than Government personnel pursuant to the FAR. However, in rejecting the plaintiff's argument, the COFC noted that the FAR provisions cited apply only to procuring agencies and their officials. Those constraints do not apply to the COFC, which is instead bound only by the protective order issued by the court.

The COFC's protective order provides for the redaction only of information that will "safeguard the competitive process, including source selection information, proprietary information, and confidential information." A party seeking to redact information must therefore show that the information's disclosure would cause competitive harm. The plaintiff argued that making such information public would enable competitors to overbid based on the belief that they could use the negative past performance evaluations against the plaintiff. The COFC rejected this argument, pointing out that: 1) procuring agencies will have access to the CPARS regardless of whether they are public; and 2) that an offeror who submits a higher price is at a disadvantage in any given procurement, and therefore, a competitor proposing a higher price than it otherwise would have submitted cannot harm the plaintiff.

So while challenges to CPARs may be necessary to correct arbitrary evaluations, if the court disagrees with the legal challenge, the negative past performance may be bared for the world to see.

featured image

Sign up to receive our latest BRiefings delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe

Tags

government contracts

Get in touch

Avatar
Kenneth Weckstein
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Kenneth Weckstein
Partner
OFAC Imposes Maximum Civil Penalty on VC Firm for Sanctions and Reporting Violations
6/27/2025 8:59:28 PM

OFAC Imposes Maximum Civil Penalty on VC Firm for Sanctions and Reporting Violations

By Daniel Sachs Nancy Turner Stephen Best
    On June 12, 2025, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury imposed a $215 million...
1
2
3

Latest Insights

Demystifying Tax Professional Negligence Claims in the UK
6/26/2025 6:12:36 PM

Demystifying Tax Professional Negligence Claims in the UK

By Matthew Sharp
20
20
DOJ’s New FCPA Guidelines Focus On Corrupt Intent and Transnational Crime
6/12/2025 1:22:12 AM

DOJ’s New FCPA Guidelines Focus On Corrupt Intent and Transnational Crime

By Daniel Sachs Steven Tyrrell Stephen Best Angela Papalaskaris +1 more...

Show less

6
20
26
HMRC Publishes Reporting Guidance For Cryptoasset Services Users and Providers
6/9/2025 2:42:25 PM

HMRC Publishes Reporting Guidance For Cryptoasset Services Users and Providers

By Jessica Lee Matthew Sharp Menelaos Karampetsos
19
19