This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Asset 3
  • About
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Public Interest
  • Inclusion
  • Contact us
    Contact us
  • Locations
    Locations
  • Search
    Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series

Search People

Search by last name

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

see all people

Asset 3
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • YouTube
  • rss
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • YouTube
  • rss

© 2024 Brown Rudnick LLP. Attorney advertising.

All Rights Reserved.

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
12/23/2024 5:37:14 PM | 2 minute read

The Man Who Claimed to Be the Inventor of Bitcoin Given Suspended Prison Sentence

14

Get in touch

Avatar
David Knight
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
David Knight
Partner
14

We have reported previously (https://briefings.brownrudnick.com/post/102j3ab/who-is-the-inventor-of-bitcoin-we-do-not-know-we-do-now-know-who-it-is-not and https://briefings.brownrudnick.com/post/102j88f/english-high-court-ruling-wright-lied-about-being-inventor-of-bitcoin) on the case brought in the High Court of England & Wales by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) against Craig Wright concerning Wright’s claim to be the inventor of Bitcoin who goes by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.  Wright was held not be the inventor of Bitcoin, and in fact had:

“lied to the Court extensively and repeatedly. Most of his lies related to the documents he had forged which purported to support his claim.”

Since then Wright seems to be getting himself into hotter and hotter water, culminating in being given a slightly early Christmas present of a suspended prison sentence.

In a decision made on 16 July 2024 (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2024/1809.pdf), the Court decided on the consequential orders that should be made following its substantive judgment.  The principle that Wright should pay COPA’s legal costs was not disputed, but there was a dispute on how much Wright should pay as an interim payment.  Reflecting the judge’s robust assessment of Wright, he ordered that Wright make an interim payment of £5.9m being 85% of COPA’s claimed costs.

Among other things, the judge held that Wright’s conduct of perjury and forgery should be referred to the Crown Prosecution Service to decide whether criminal proceedings should be brought against Wright.  Seemingly, however, Wright was in a hurry to roll the dice with the British criminal justice system as discussed further below.   

Among the other orders made at that hearing were that Wright, in summary, should cease asserting that he owns rights in Bitcoin and bringing claims anywhere against anyone alleging infringement of his (non-existent) rights in Bitcoin.  Notwithstanding this, in October 2024, Wright issued a claim BTC Core and Square Up Europe Ltd asserting that Wright owns the rights in Bitcoin and that the defendants were passing off BTC as Bitcoin.  The value of the claim was stated to be an eye-watering £911 billion.

COPA issued an application for contempt of court (a criminal offence) and, at a preliminary hearing six weeks ahead of the hearing, Wright was ordered to attend the hearing, scheduled for 18 December 2024, in person.  Less than an hour before the hearing was due to commence, Wright sent an email to the court saying that he was in Asia and could not afford to attend.  The hearing went ahead nevertheless.  The judge had no difficulty in finding Wright in contempt, recording (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2024/3315.pdf):-

“I have found, to the requisite criminal standard of proof, that Dr Wright committed each of the contempts alleged by COPA in their Grounds 1 to 5 inclusive.  Indeed, in my judgment, there is no doubt whatever that each of these contempts has been proved.”

The sentencing hearing took place immediately after and the written reasons for the judge’s decision handed down the following day (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2024/3316.pdf).  The case against BTC Core and Square Up Europe Ltd was struck out and Wright ordered to pay their costs in that case on an indemnity basis.  Further, Wright was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, suspended for two years.  The term of imprisonment will be activated if, at any time in two years, Wright commits any further breach of the orders made against him.

Given his conduct to date it would seem likely Wright will continue to show contempt for the English judicial process, and it is perhaps a question of when, rather than if, the suspension will be lifted.  In those circumstances it would seem unlikely that Wright will step onto U.K. soil to enable an easy arrest to be made, and maybe an international arrest warrant will be sought.  The saga continues …

hands of a prisoner behind prison bars

Get in touch

Avatar
David Knight
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
David Knight
Partner
[2025] UKUT 00124 (TCC) George Mantides Limited v HMRC: Further Ammunition for HMRC in Its Battle Against Self-Employment in Healthcare?
5/1/2025 2:34:46 PM

[2025] UKUT 00124 (TCC) George Mantides Limited v HMRC: Further Ammunition for HMRC in Its Battle Against Self-Employment in Healthcare?

By Matthew Sharp
One of the unusual aspects of the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) decision in Mantides (which was the subject of this appeal to the Upper...
38
38

Latest Insights

Fourth Circuit Holds That Short-Seller Report Does Not Establish Loss Causation for Securities Claims
4/9/2025 5:32:36 PM

Fourth Circuit Holds That Short-Seller Report Does Not Establish Loss Causation for Securities Claims

By Jonathan Richman
3
3
New PTAB Ruling Highlights Critical IPR Petition Requirements: Consistency Between PTAB and District Court Proceedings
3/24/2025 6:05:50 PM

New PTAB Ruling Highlights Critical IPR Petition Requirements: Consistency Between PTAB and District Court Proceedings

By Erick Robinson
7
7
Artificial Intelligence, Real Risks: How Insurance Companies Can Provide Coverage in Response to AI Washing
3/21/2025 1:20:49 PM

Artificial Intelligence, Real Risks: How Insurance Companies Can Provide Coverage in Response to AI Washing

By Darion Alexander Daniel Healy
6
6