This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
Asset 3
  • About
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • Insights
  • Careers
  • Public Interest
  • Inclusion
  • Contact us
    Contact us
  • Locations
    Locations
  • Search
    Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series
  • Contact Us
  • Location
  • Search
  • About
    • About
    • Message From the CEO
    • Firm History
    • Alumni
    • Alumni
    • In Memoriam
  • People
  • Capabilities
    • Practices
    • Industries
    • Global Reach: The Law Firm Network
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Transactions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Investment Management 
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology
    • Real Estate
    • Bankruptcy & Restructuring
    • Bankruptcy Litigation
    • Mass Torts Bankruptcy
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents
    • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Civil Fraud Litigation
    • Employment Practices and Litigation
    • Government Contracts Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation Funding
    • M&A and Private Equity Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB)
    • UK Tax Controversy & Litigation
    • Special Situations, Distressed Debt and Debt Trading
    • Distressed Debt & Claims Trading
    • Litigation Funding
    • Finance
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Transactions
    • Capital Markets
    • Cross-Border Transactions
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Employment
    • Finance
    • Franchising
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Tax
    • White Collar Defense, Investigations & Compliance
    • Economic Sanctions & Export Controls
    • Energy & Environmental
    • Energy
    • Energy Transition
    • Environmental
    • Entertainment & Media
    • Brand & Reputation Management
    • Intellectual Property
    • Sports
    • Investment Management
    • Fund Formation
    • Private Equity Transactions
    • Distressed Debt
    • Emerging Growth Companies & Venture Capital
    • Family-Owned & Closely Held Businesses
    • Private Equity Litigation
    • Life Sciences
    • BR BioAdvisory Services
    • Technology
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity & Data Privacy
    • Digital Commerce
    • Fintech
    • Real Estate
    • Hospitality & Leisure
    • Distressed Real Estate
    • Real Estate Special Situations
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Wireless Network Infrastructure
  • Insights
    • Client News
    • Firm News
    • Briefings
    • Events
  • Careers
    • Experienced Lawyers
    • U.S. Law Students
    • London Trainee Program
    • Business Professionals
    • Professional Development
  • Public Interest
    • Brown Rudnick Charitable Foundation
    • Pro Bono & Community Service
  • Inclusion
    • Inclusion
    • Women in Business Series

Search People

Search by last name

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

see all people

Asset 3
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • YouTube
  • rss
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • X (formerly known as Twitter)
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • YouTube
  • rss

© 2024 Brown Rudnick LLP. Attorney advertising.

All Rights Reserved.

All Posts Subscribe
print-logo
6/1/2020 3:38:00 PM | 5 minute read

Market Conduct Obligations in the Context of Coronavirus

Get in touch

Avatar
Brown Rudnick
Avatar
Ian Weinstein
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Brown Rudnick
Avatar
Ian Weinstein
Partner

On 27 May 2020, the FCA published its latest Market Watch bulletin (“Market Watch 63”). Market Watch 63 focuses on the FCA’s expectations in relation to market conduct in the context of Coronavirus.

Market Watch 63 makes clear that, while the FCA has been willing to temporarily relax certain rules as a result of Coronavirus (e.g. in relation to reporting deadlines), market participants remain expected to comply fully with their market conduct obligations. Further, Market Watch 63 puts firms, and the responsible individuals at firms, on notice that they need to make sure that the systems and controls that are in place to ensure compliance with market conduct obligations take into account any changes in circumstances caused by Coronavirus (e.g. alternative working arrangements). This is especially important considering that an increase in primary market activity is expected as issuers seek to raise funds.

This note sets out some practical steps that market participants can take to minimise the risk that they fail to comply with their market conduct obligations. It particularly focuses on areas which have become higher risk as a result of Coronavirus.

Any market participant found not to have complied with its market conduct obligations can expect the FCA to take a hardline approach and to make full use of its criminal and regulatory powers. Market conduct was already a priority area for the FCA prior to Coronavirus and Market Watch 63 has now put market participants on notice about what is expected. Market participants will therefore want to be able to demonstrate that they have given active consideration to the issues raised by Market Watch 63 and taken appropriate action.

Key issues raised by the FCA and practical steps that can be taken

Identification and handling of inside information

The increase in primary market activity combined with market participants moving to alternative sites or working from home means that there will be both an increase in the flow of inside information and a change in the way that those information flows operate.

Firms need to help ensure that employees are working in safe and secure environments when carrying out sensitive transactions. Working from home could lead to inside information being disclosed inadvertently (e.g by leaving a laptop open, sharing a printer or others in the household overhearing a telephone call). These practicalities are hard to implement and monitor and the security of the information will rely mostly on the sense and care of the people who have access to the information. Notwithstanding this, firms should be giving guidance to individuals and taking all the steps that they can to minimise the risk that inside information is mis-handled

Market participants will want to consider:

  • Reviewing the availability or the application of controls for restricting access to inside information on secure IT systems and how access to inside information can be remotely supervised.
  • Implementing/revising policies about what documentation can be stored at home and how it should be stored, managed and disposed of.
  • Ensuring that, to the extent appropriate, front office staff are still taking two-week block leave.

Appropriate disclosure of inside information

Market participants will need to take account of Coronavirus and related circumstances when considering what constitutes inside information. As well as noting that issuers should carefully monitor whether any new information is materially different from previous forecasts, the FCA has provided the following as examples of information that could have a significant effect on a company’s share price:

  • Detail on future financial performance, such as access to finance and funding. This includes through government schemes, significant changes in cash flow patterns, force majeure or termination rights in material contracts or financial arrangements, and changes to dividends or buy-back schemes.
  • A firm’s ability to continue or resume business resumption plans, arrangements for staff returning to work, and supply chains.

As can be seen from the above, the principle of what constitutes inside information remains the same but circumstances relating to Coronavirus create novel scenarios which need to be thought through.

Further practical steps that firms can take to help ensure that inside information is not inappropriately disclosed include:

  • Making sure that individuals are aware of when they are on insider lists and that the reason that an individual has been provided with inside information is recorded.
  • Refreshing training for individuals on their legal and regulatory obligations, including handling and disclosing inside information, market soundings and personal account dealing (see Market Watch 62 for further details of the FCA’s current concerns in relation to personal account dealing).
  • Disclosing inside information as soon as possible, subject to the provisions on delayed disclosure.
  • When delaying disclosure of inside information, making sure that holding announcements are prepared in case there is an actual or likely breach. This is particularly important at present given market uncertainties and changed working arrangements.

Meeting the transparency and short position covering requirements under the Short Selling Regulation

Consistent with its 17 March 2020 statement, the FCA has not banned the short selling of UK shares but has emphasised the importance of firms meeting their obligations under the Short Selling Regulation. This includes ESMSA’s recent reduction of the threshold for notifying net short position from 0.2% of issued share capital to 0.1%. Firms should make sure that they closely monitor any changes in this rule as the regulatory response to Coronavirus’ impact on markets continues to develop.

Identifying and managing conflicts of interest

In Market Watch 63, the FCA restates that it has heard reports of a small number of banks failing to treat their corporate clients fairly when negotiating new or existing debt facilities. The FCA refers to its 28 April 2020 Dear CEO Letter in which it raised the issue of banks exerting pressure on corporate clients to secure roles on equity mandates that they would not otherwise be appointed to. The FCA makes clear that it will take action if these claims are substantiated.

Both banks and other firms should heed the sentiment of the FCA’s warning. Unfairly using financial difficulties created or exacerbated by Coronavirus to the detriment of a client will be seen as a breach of the Principles. Firms will need to take this into account when making judgement calls about how to interact with clients and ensuring that they are being treated fairly.

Conclusion

Market Watch 63 means that market participants are unambiguously on notice that the FCA will not accept Coronavirus as an excuse for market conduct failings. In fact, in some circumstances Coronavirus will be seen as an aggravating factor. While some of the issues raised by Coronavirus can be navigated relatively simply by the implementation of practical steps, others will require finer judgements to be made and a detailed analysis of the specific circumstances to be undertaken

Market participants need to make sure that they are giving active consideration – and evidencing that consideration – to how they are ensuring compliance with market conduct issues arising from Coronavirus.

Click to view the full alert.

The views expressed herein are solely the views of the authors and do not represent the views of Brown Rudnick LLP, those parties represented by the authors, or those parties represented by Brown Rudnick LLP. Specific legal advice depends on the facts of each situation and may vary from situation to situation. Information contained in this article is not intended to constitute legal advice by the authors or the lawyers at Brown Rudnick LLP, and it does not establish a lawyer-client relationship.

Get in touch

Avatar
Brown Rudnick
Avatar
Ian Weinstein
Partner

Get in touch

Avatar
Brown Rudnick
Avatar
Ian Weinstein
Partner
DOJ Updates White-Collar Enforcement Priorities
5/15/2025 8:37:21 PM

DOJ Updates White-Collar Enforcement Priorities

By Daniel Sachs Steven Tyrrell Stephen Best Angela Papalaskaris +1 more...

Show less

DOJ Updates White-Collar Crime Enforcement Priorities  On May 12, 2025, the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)...

Latest Insights

Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) and Tax Disputes: Navigating a Complex Compliance Landscape
5/12/2025 12:30:58 PM

Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) and Tax Disputes: Navigating a Complex Compliance Landscape

By Matthew Sharp
2
2
Raising the Stakes: UK Government Consults on the Tax Treatment of Remote Gaming and Gambling
5/9/2025 2:45:43 PM

Raising the Stakes: UK Government Consults on the Tax Treatment of Remote Gaming and Gambling

By Matthew Sharp Menelaos Karampetsos
1
14
15
[2025] UKUT 00124 (TCC) George Mantides Limited v HMRC: Further Ammunition for HMRC in Its Battle Against Self-Employment in Healthcare?
5/1/2025 2:34:46 PM

[2025] UKUT 00124 (TCC) George Mantides Limited v HMRC: Further Ammunition for HMRC in Its Battle Against Self-Employment in Healthcare?

By Matthew Sharp
39
39